|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison testing for the
removal of mechanical emulsified oil from water was performed
using polypropylene storm drain insert filtration fabric, and
X-Tex-AC-100 filtration fabric. The first sets of tests were
conducted to look at the efficiency of X-Tex-AC-100 to remove
mechanical oil emulsion.
A stock of 6,600-mg/l oil (50% motor oil/diesel) and water
emulsion was made mechanically by blending and shaking in
individual one liter bottles. The oil water emulsion was poured
through a 3inch diameter filter housing holding one sheet of the
polypropylene insert fabric and one sheet of the X-Tex-AC-100,
one additional liter of water was passed through each filter
apparatus, the water was captured in a separatory funnel and
extracted by method 1664 to determine hexane extractable oil and
grease. The Stock emulsion was analyzed for ppm oil by running
the water through the empty filter holder accounting for
retained oil on the bottle walls and filter housing. The same
process was repeated using two layers of each material, the
results obtained are as shown in figure 1 below.
Figure 1
|
Residual Oil
After |
|
Material Type |
Filtration (mg/l) |
Percent Oil Removal |
| Polypropylene
1 Layer |
651 |
90.2 |
| Polypropylene
2 Layer |
226 |
96.6 |
| X-Tex-AC 1
Layer |
44.3 |
99.3 |
| X-Tex-AC 2
Layer |
19.1 |
99.7 |
Figure 2 illustrates the residual oil in the water after
passing through each filter media.
Figure 2

Figure 3

Conclusion
These results demonstrate that X-Tex-AC-100 removes more
of the mechanical emulsified oil than the polypropylene products
(currently the industry standard). |
|
|
Back to
X-Tex-AC main page
|